The key to controlling future wild hog populations in the United States is by overcoming the four unique conditions stated in a previous blog titled, UNDERSTANDING THE WILD HOG PROBLEM which are:
- High reproduction rate allows the capacity to recover quickly from most control efforts.
- High intelligence level elevates education during failed control attempts.
- Incredible sense of smell to avoid substandard control efforts.
- Human dimensions (must change first to adopt new methods and technologies).
DAMAGE MANAGEMENT IS NOT POPULATION CONTROL
The academic definition of Integrated Wildlife Damage Management (IWDM) is “the integration and application of all approved methods of prevention and management to reduce wildlife damage. The IWDM approach may incorporate cultural practices, habitat modification, animal behavior management, local population reduction or a combination of these approaches.” The IWDM definition implies the focus is to reduce the damage caused by wild hogs; not necessarily eliminate the population by efficiently targeting the entire sounder.
The IWDM approach also incorporates or recommends a range of non-lethal and lethal techniques for resolving conflicts with feral swine. Nonlethal methods used or recommended by the IWDM model may include fencing and aversive devices which do not prevent reproduction of the species thereby offering no benefit or solution to the problem. JAGER PRO believes there is no justification to incorporate cultural practices, modify habitat or manage the behavior of a non-native, invasive species. Lethal population control is the only credible option for wild hogs since they exhibit such an extremely high reproduction rate and intelligence.
Wild hogs are NOT native to the United States

Therefore, this agricultural pest should not be treated or managed as wildlife, but rather efficiently controlled as vermin under an Integrated Pest Control (IPC) model. Wild hogs carry parasites and diseases which pose a threat to human health, domestic livestock, pets and wildlife which harmfully impacts agriculture, natural resources, soil erosion, water quality and property. Unlike other agricultural pests, there is not an acceptable population level (action threshold) for wild hogs. Any indicator on a property requires immediate lethal action as hogs have no natural predators (biological controls) and there are currently no chemical controls legally approved for use in the United States. Preventive cultural controls and physical controls do not prevent reproduction. Mechanical controls such as high-volume trapping and thermal night shooting are the most efficient options. Lethal control is the Best Management Practice (BMP) for feral swine.
A farmer has the same right to remove corn rootworms, soybean aphids and feral swine from their crops (our food and clothing) as a homeowner’s right to remove termites, rats or cockroaches from their home. Insect versus mammal makes no difference to the legal definition of a pest or the BMPs needed to control them. Pigs were released into the wild by ignorant humans. Therefore, this man-made problem requires an efficient, man-made solution.
INTEGRATED WILD PIG CONTROL® MODEL

Focusing efforts to reduce entire wild hog populations (one sounder at a time) will automatically reduce the damage caused to agriculture, natural resources and property. Implementing the most efficient methods and technologies to accomplish whole-sounder removal will also reduce previous fuel, time and labor expenses. A national performance standard must focus on efficiently controlling wild hog populations; not managing their damage. Our IWPC® Training Manual was written to provide the Mission Essential Task List (METL) needed to train 22 standardized tasks then execute a control plan and measure the results.
Learn more about the Integrated Wild Pig Control® (IWPC®) model and how it is applied in real-world field operations in this overview video.
CHANGING THE HOG CONTROL STANDARD
JAGER PRO® is not seeking to replace the important work conducted by government agencies, universities, or wildlife professionals. Research, education, and public outreach have played a significant role in improving our understanding of feral swine biology, behavior, disease transmission, and environmental impacts.
However, as wild hog populations continue to expand across the United States, there is an increasing need to complement scientific knowledge with practical, results-driven control strategies that can be implemented at scale.
State and federal agencies often face limitations in funding, manpower, and resources. As a result, solving the wild hog problem requires collaboration between public agencies, private landowners, agricultural producers, wildlife professionals, and industry innovators.
JAGER PRO® believes the private sector can play an important role in providing the additional labor, technology, and operational capability needed to reduce wild hog populations. Similar to how professional pest control companies help homeowners manage termites, rodents, and other invasive pests, specialized hog control operators can help landowners implement proven control strategies on their properties.
Universities and wildlife professionals continue to provide valuable research and educational resources. At the same time, field experience has demonstrated that successful wild hog control requires more than understanding hog biology and ecology. It also requires practical application, performance measurement, and continuous adaptation to changing conditions in the field.
The Integrated Wild Pig Control® (IWPC®) model was developed to bridge this gap by combining research-based knowledge with operational best practices. The emphasis is placed on measurable outcomes, whole-sounder removal, and the use of technologies and methods that improve efficiency while reducing the likelihood of educating surviving hogs.
As wild hog populations adapt and expand, the standards for control must continue to evolve. By combining scientific understanding, field experience, emerging technology, and performance-based decision making, landowners and control operators can achieve more effective long-term results.
The ultimate goal is not to debate approaches, but to work toward a common objective: reducing wild hog populations and minimizing the damage they cause to agriculture, natural resources, property, livestock, and wildlife.




